Marxist philosophy is not to be found in Marx’s writings, but emerged retrospectively in of For Marx and (with Etienne Balibar) Reading Capital (trans. ETIENNE BALIBAR. “Succinct and informative”. Fredric Jameson. “A trenchant and exciting analysis of the philosophy of Marx”. Immanuel Wallerstein. A rich and accessible introduction to Marx’s fundamental concepts from a key intellectual—now updated Written by one of political theory’s.
|Published (Last):||2 November 2009|
|PDF File Size:||4.55 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.7 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
So we have the right then to interpret the implications of what Marx wrote.
What however this book does not deliver valibar its promise of the nuances that it highlights. In fact, Balibar denies the possibility of Marxism playing any important role in both society and academia because of “the long and difficult process of separation from ‘historical Marxism'”; in other words, he succumbs to anti-communist ideology and IMO therefore accepts an idealist conception of society, despite his pretensions earlier in the book.
I was scanning pjilosophy his Spinoza book to not-buy in its place. There are difficult sections, which is inevitable since the topic of the book is, after all, Marx and Marxism, but Balibar handles the difficult material very fluently so that I personally found it phjlosophy and informative. Paperbackpages. Indeed, you would have to familiar with the primary texts and a good bit of post-structuralist and post-Marxist jargon to get past parts of the last chapter.
This critique aside, I find Balibar’s book to be challenging and engaging when it is clear. Varn rated it really liked it.
This book is touted as an introductory text for Marx. This means that philosophy that is not enacted is not operating in good faith. Capitalism being necessarily transformative, it is necessarily true that society will evolve in the future and revolutionary practice will evolve along with it. When Libertarian Americans appeal to Ayn Rand as an icon, to choose an example which would be absurd if the world was not insane, why is it not ideal to summon the arguments Marx wrote against the egoism of Max Stirner in the Ideologies?
Feb 13, Ty rated it liked it.
‘The Philosophy of Marx’ by Étienne Balibar – TheoryLeaks
One of the most influential French philosophers to have emerged from the s, Balibar I suspect because this is sort of a liner-notes form of Baliber’s developed critique in Masses, Classes and Idea that there is no reason to assume that class structures will because consistent because “the emergence of a revolutionary form of subjectivity or identity Marx makes the dangerously philosophical point that the world is ever-changing, so the attempt to describe reality is a pointless celebration of individualistic interpretations of bxlibar world.
Marx was at his most anti-philosophical, perhaps predictably, upon immediately turning away from philosophical academia. Certainly this is true, but one of Balibar’s achievements is philosolhy show what a break this was in the philosophical tradition and just how complex this flip to materialism made of the whole idea of process.
Some section transitions seemed rushed and a little forced as well. You are commenting using your WordPress. Nevertheless this pnilosophy a useful and interesting book from a key figure in the development of the structuralist study of Msrx. Balibar reads this as an aporia: For Marx, writes Balibar, the proletariat was not really a class at all.
When they said that Balibar is an authority on Marx, they weren’t joking! Ideology is produced by society, but itself also produces the ideas through which members of a society collectively understand a reality. I don’t like this book. Most of the good ones were fairly clear. It serves as a good introduction to academic debates within Thf e.
Review: The Philosophy of Marx – Etienne Balibar (Verso, 1997)
Mar 07, Robert rated it it was amazing. Balibar really makes Marx speak to the history of philosophy in a fascinating way. Refers to criticisms and perspectives as though the reader knows them without introduction or anything and the topics it does introduce are sometimes really hurried.
He is only concerned with the abstractions that emerge from Marx’s own development. Whether or not the young Marx was thinking this way, Balibar contends, he fortunately soon changed his mind. Lebowitz – – Brill. Open Preview See a Problem? It is not an introduction to Marx’s sociology or his economics. See 1 question about The Philosophy of Marx…. I would warn against using this as an introductory text which for some reason is how I initially thought of itbut as a bridge between Marx and philosophical traditions it is clear and insightful.
Apr 25, Michael Di benedetto rated it it was amazing. The failures of the revolts furthered his disappoints. Materialism for Marx is not something based on independent static material objects interacting with each through external links. If you want a ready an interesting and provocation, but brief philosophical treatise on Marx, do read Balibar.
Jul 12, Ryan Day rated it really liked it. History burdened Marx with any number of crises in maintaining this belief.
The point, of course, is to change the world and this can only be done through political praxis. In this, Marx was way before his time in anticipating some of the main tenets of what we call Modernism 1: He believes that the development of Marxism between and was a failure and it is indeed jarring when an interesting analysis of the concept of the withering away of the state reaches its conclusion with Stalin executing the theorist.
Balibar is nevertheless cheerful about the implications of this. I consider people like Balibar as closet enemies of the working class and are only using Marx’s work to further their own academic careers. Marx, however, seems to indicate unsure of this: And of balibaf, read Marx’s own writings.
The Philosophy of Marx by Étienne Balibar | : Books
In the 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, Marx was forced to admit that the economic realities of the working class created class unity but also competition between workers for resources. As an obvious consequence of its length, it doesn’t cover a huge amount of stuff. Capital was, Balibar reminds us, written in the aftermath of both the revolutionary disappointments of and the Paris Commune of Nov 22, Iany Mcgrawn rated it it was amazing.